Friday, October 12, 2007

NFL week 5 – the Velvet Bear

I hadn't intended to catch the Cowboys/Bills game this week. The team with the most points in the NFL in opposition to the side with the worst defense anywhere didn't exactly look mouthwatering, unless you are the sort of person who likes watching Bambi's mother get shot (or unless you support Leicestershire at cricket, in which case why would you want to suffer twice?).

Fortunately, a slightly complicated sequence of events, where nothing worked out quite as I intended it to, meant that I ended up seeing the game anyway. I'm really glad that I did. Forget the fact that the Cowboys won 25-24. Forget the fact that they did so with a 53 yard field goal in the final second*. Forget, even, that along the way Tony Romo, imperious this season, threw no fewer than five interceptions. To me, it was what the Bills did in the first quarter that was special.

First of all, we had two exceptional pieces of skill from Bills punter Brian Moorman. Now, punters really are the runts of any NFL team. Their sole role in the team is to come onto the pitch when their team's offense has failed to move the ball the requisite 10 yards in the first 3 downs.

They are then expected to hoof the ball as high and as far as they can, hopefully landing it somewhere inside the final 10 metres of the opposition half. That's it. Maybe they get to make the occasional tackle if their opponents catch the punt and manage to run it back far enough. Very very occasionally they get to take a long range kick at goal. It is a job which lacks glamour, thanks and – in NFL terms – money.

In this game, the Bills received the ball from the kick-off. They ground to a halt well inside their own half after 3 plays and so Moorman was sent for, with the side still 4 yards short of a first down.

The ball was snapped back. Moorman caught it. And ran and ran. For a full 10 yards. It doesn't sound much, but for someone to do something like that on the fourth play of a match takes real guts. If he hadn't made the first four yards, Moorman would have handed the Cowboys the ball deep in his own half. Because remember, those 10 yards are measured from where the ball started, not where Moorman started, which was a good 20-25 yards from where the ball was snapped to him.

The surprise of that move didn't unsettle the Cowboys too much and, although Moorman had given his side another four downs, they failed to make any real headway with the first three and so he was very quickly back on the field again. This time he did punt the ball in the normal way, this time from just inside the Dallas half (or at least the ball was just inside the Dallas half, see above).

With accuracy astonishing even at this level, Moorman landed the ball just two yards from the Dallas goal line. Which meant Dallas had to play from practically on their own line and the pressure was enough for Romo to throw his first interception of the evening – one which was run straight back at him for a touchdown to the Bills.

Even more remarkable was what happened the next time Dallas had the ball. Romo threw another interception. Moreover, their offensive team looked completely rattled by a defence reaching legendary levels of uselessness. It took a little while to work out why. To understand, you need to understand the 'line of scrimmage'.

The line of scrimmage is the point where the two teams face one another. On one side you have the offensive line and on the other the defensive. The offensive line will almost always have 5 players in it, sometimes even more. The defensive line can have anywhere between 3 and 7 players in it, depending upon what the offense does. The players crouch down like sprinters in the 'set' position, with either one or two hands on the ground.

What the Bills were doing was putting anything up to 7 players on the line, but only one of them was going into the 'set' position; the rest of them were standing like – to continue the athletics analogy – the way middle distance runners do when they start a race. Not only was this perfectly legal, it was confusing the hell out of the Cowboys, who didn't seem to have a clue what was going on. It is one of those tactics that probably isn't going to work more than once, but full credit to whoever came up with it.

In the rest of the NFL:
Two seasons ago, the Steelers and the Seahawks contested the Superbowl. Last season the Seahawks suffered badly from the strange phenomena whereby the losing Superbowl side suffers a spate of injuries which ruins their season. The Seahawks seem to have managed to get that to carry over to this season, but even that can't excuse being shut out by a Steelers side who still look pretty average;

In a sad postscript to the above, Seahawks fullback Mack Strong announced that he had a serious spinal condition and that his career was over, although thankfully his quality of life is not affected;

The Patriot's Tom Brady tied an NFL record by throwing three touchdowns for the fifth consecutive game as the Pats destroyed the Browns 34-17. The most interesting thing about this game was an after game spat between Eric Steinbach of the Browns and the Pats' Mike Vrabel over a late hit towards the end of the game. Steinbach called Vrabel 'classless' which, frankly, is like Victoria Beckham calling another Spice Girl 'talentless'. NFL players are picked for many things, but being classy isn't one of them;

The Cardinals eked out a win over St Louis by 34-31, but in doing so lost QB Matt Leinhart for the season with a broken collarbone;

More heartache for Miami as the Dolphins slump to 0-5 by virtue of a 22-18 loss to the Texans. More importantly, they also lost QB Trent Green with grade 3 concussion – the most severe – when he tried to make a block on Houston tackle Travis Johnson. He will miss at least one game and probably more;

In fact, injuries are really beginning to take their toll in the NFL this season. The determining factor seems to be which team manages to cope best without a large number of stars. High up this list will be the Colts, who shook off losing 5 starters to beat Tampa Bay 33-14. The Bucs in turn will lose RB Michael Pittman for at least 6 weeks with an ankle injury;

Over in Carolina, QB Jake Delhomme is out for the season with an elbow injury, but they just manage to edge out the Saints 16-13;

Painfully, the Broncos lose starting center Tom Naylen with a torn bicep. Even more painfully, they put up their worst performance for almost 30 years in losing 34-3 at home to the Steelers, who barely even bother to break sweat in the final quarter;

In Wisconsin, a genuine “Star me, how did that happen?” moment as the Bears, led by Brian Griese, beat the Packers 27-20 to claim bragging rights in one of the NFL's oldest rivalries;
Things can't even go right for the Vikings on a week off, as Tavaris Jackson announces that he will be fit for this weekend's game. I thought they just shot lame donkeys?

*The equivalent of Jonny Wilkinson kicking a penalty from inside his own half to beat the French with the last kick of the match this Saturday. Except I won't complain if he does.

16 comments:

andrewm said...

I really, really meant to follow the action this week, but then I didn't. Damn it.

Excellent round-up, Bear. I'm really enjoying these articles and I can feel my enthusiasm for the sport returning, no matter how shit the Vikings are.

One point: I know the comparisons between rugby and AF are fairly pointless, but since you make one yourself and since I happened to watch the England-Australia match, let me just say this - AF requires far more skill in every aspect. To give just one example, Wilkinson stands over those penalty kicks for about ten minutes, then kicks a dead ball and still manages to shank at least one third of them. Don't tell me that kicking fieldgoals in AF isn't far more difficult, because if you do you will be wrong. So there.

Ebren said...

Andy – love you to bits but it is not I that is wrong. Point 1, Wilkinson is only allowed one minute (they capped it). Point two, every AF kick is from directly in front of the post. Point 3 – Wilkinson stands still, but does not have a team of big people trained specifically for the only job of blocking for him, and does not have the time before the snap to set himself. Point 4 – and this is the killer – Wilkinson’s coach (Dave Aldred) left RU and moved to AF when RU was amateur.

And that’s the problem. Mr Aldred was a highly successful AF kicker (for Minnesota Vikings) and only a mediocre RU kicker, and became one of the best kicking coaches in the world.

So the idea that there is less skill in one sport than the other strikes me as odd – because they are trained by the same people, to the same standard.

Different game, different ball, different turf, different field positions. I would imagine that was more important than the skill levels.

andrewm said...

Ebren, true in AF you kick from in front of the posts, but regardless of the blockers in front of you you still run in with the knowledge that some large men are attempting to mow you down, and also that the ball may not even be in position when you get there. You have to run in trusting that the ball will be in position and you will be protected, retain total focus and make a clean kick. No comparison, really.

That was just one example. I don't doubt there's skill in rugby, it just struck me watching the England match that you can go whole matches without actually seeing any.

That said, I enjoyed that match, and I didn't really want to start having a go at rugby.

Velvet Bear said...

Big punchup between two Vikings players in training yesterday, apparently.

You are both right on the kicking thing. AF kickers get players charging at them, but more significantly they have to kick with someone else holding the ball, which means that they have to start their runup without the ball actually being in place. They rely upon someone else to put the ball in the right place and facing the right way.

I know that in rugby this sometimes happens, but the kicker still gets to place the ball and line it up himself. He'll also kick from a tee , not the ground.

I think the posts in AF are slightly higher, too.

On the other hand, AF players do kick from almost directly in front of the posts and often do so in indoor arenas, where there is no wind. It is a recognised Fantasy trick to pick a kicker from a side who play their home games indoors, as they have a far greater success rate.

The big difference, though, is that AF divides the roles of kicker and punter, whereas RU [and RL] expect one player to have both skills.

andrewm said...

Yes, in a way we are both right.

But in another, more important way, I am.

file said...

: )

guitougoal said...

Obviously it's not an easy call, AF or Rugby kick. Didn't the NFL use to recruit the kicker from the european soccer teams?

offsideintahiti said...

NFL Kicker? Must be the least rewarding job in the universe. You do nothing all game (hell, all season), and then you come on at the last second of the Superbowl, with your team trailing by 2 points, the pressure is like at 10,000ft underwater and you... miss.

What was that guy's name? That was a good few years ago, I can't remember.

Cheers Bear!

andrewm said...

offy, I believe the name you're looking for is Scott Norwood.

That's the name I'm looking for, come to think of it. Please address me as Scott from now on.

Mr Norwood to the rest of you, of course.

Ebren said...

I think Adam sandler put it best


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggewMGEE_W0

bluedaddy said...

"Yes, in a way we are both right.

But in another, more important way, I am".

Mind if I borrow that one AM? (I'll give you due credit of course).

andrewm said...

BD, I adapted it from the Simpsons, so feel free to use it in any way that makes you happy.

andrewm said...

Vikings 34, Bears 31.

Boo-ya! How you like me now?

DoctorShoot said...

love the little details VB

Don Lane used to have AF on late at night in OZ and I enjoyed it immensely. tactics and pressure, and a real team game, though there seem to be a few too many restrictions on what a lot of players can do, or is that merely by choice?
but nice to see a game where thuggery vs skill still has it's place and is catered for in the hero status of the skilled, and the personal protective equipment issue...

mimi said...

I freely admit to knowing nothing about NFL, but do enjoy reading Velvet's reports.

If I may comment, comparisons between different sports are usually invidious and offer no great insight, but it is quite fun to compare Aussie rules to virtually any other kick and run ball game. Because Rules, having no rules, no protective clothing, and men who have no fear (and maybe no brains!) wins every time. And no other sport has neatly clad umpires in long white coats who do those amazing twiddly finger gestures.

Time surely for one of Psueds Aussies (Lev: where are you??) to limber up and prepare us with some thoughts on the season past and the season to come.

Anonymous said...

What's up, always i used to check webpage posts here in the early hours in the morning, because i like to find out more and more.

my website payday loans no credit check

Tweet it, digg it